Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (1215MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q +96%
4.666 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

600 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
1536
120
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy