Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1380MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
5.299 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +178%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
8192
120
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
8 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy