Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
1888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +7808%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
4
1920
Shading Units
32
120
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G84
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy