Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1380MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
7.066 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +108%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

780 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
8192
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
320
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
220.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
14.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
220.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
8 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy