Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +2526%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
192
144
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
38W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK107
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy