Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +871%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
51W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK107
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy