Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +516%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
960
144
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK104
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy