Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1350MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
8.294 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +66%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
7680
192
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
120
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
259.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
259.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
8 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy