Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +2164%
10.87 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
4
3072
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

113.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
339.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
21.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
339.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GF106
N19E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy