CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
+176%
10.87 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
VS
Tesla K20Xm
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
2688
192
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
48
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
113.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
339.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
21.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
339.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GK110
N19E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
110W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA L40 CNX
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy