Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +10224%
11.15 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
6
3072
Shading Units
48
192
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GT216
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy