CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
+24272%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
VS
Quadro FX 1700
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
32
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
G84
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Board Design
260W
TDP
42W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla S1070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
2
NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
3
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
5
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
6
NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
7
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K500
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
Related News
1
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
2
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
3
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
4
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
5
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
6
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
7
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
8
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
9
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
10
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy