Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1600MHz vs 1560MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Lower TDP (260W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +264%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
14.38 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
VS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Aug 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
16384
Shading Units
4608
1024
TMUs
288
0
ROPs
96
1024
Tensor Cores
576
128
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

2400W
TDP
260W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
100 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
2
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M
3
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
4
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
5
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
6
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 8 GB
7
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA L40
8
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Tesla P10
9
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
10
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

Related News

1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy