CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K100M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K100M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
NVIDIA Quadro K100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
+4311%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro K100M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
VS
Quadro K100M
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Board Design
260W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA L40S
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K600
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K180Q
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy