CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla S870
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla S870
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
NVIDIA Tesla S870
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 1536MB VRAM Tesla S870 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
+4056%
14.38 TFLOPS
Tesla S870
0.346 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
VS
Tesla S870
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
16
4608
Shading Units
128
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
260W
TDP
800W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
G80
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Related News
1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy