Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla S870

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla S870

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 1536MB VRAM Tesla S870 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +4056%
14.38 TFLOPS
Tesla S870
0.346 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
16
4608
Shading Units
128
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
800W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G80
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy