Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA A10M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA A10M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1770MHz vs 1635MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000
16.31 TFLOPS
A10M +43%
23.44 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
56
4608
Shading Units
7168
288
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
80
576
Tensor Cores
224
72
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GA102
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net