NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
4600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000
+77566%
16.31 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 150M
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
1
4608
Shading Units
8
288
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.120 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.120 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
260W
TDP
10W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
G98
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GE
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
