Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 115% (1770MHz vs 824MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 240.6GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 +296%
16.31 TFLOPS
Tesla K80
4.113 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Nov 2014
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
824 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
2496
288
TMUs
208
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.85 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
171.4 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.113 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1371 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK210
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK210-885-A1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.1 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.7
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy