Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 +2522%
16.31 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
30
4608
Shading Units
240
288
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
800W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GT200B
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy