Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K120Q

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K120Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 512MB VRAM GRID K120Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K120Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +4479%
14.93 TFLOPS
GRID K120Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy