Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
4256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (172W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1967%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000 SDI
0.722 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
120.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
11
4608
Shading Units
352
288
TMUs
44
96
ROPs
40
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.29 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.57 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.3 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
361.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
172W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video 2x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GF100
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy