Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 24GB VRAM Tesla T40 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1620MHz vs 1560MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 624.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +3%
14.93 TFLOPS
Tesla T40 24 GB
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Turing
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
624.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
72
4608
Shading Units
4608
288
TMUs
288
96
ROPs
96
576
Tensor Cores
576
72
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
260W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
TU102
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy