Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
4600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +87723%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
1
4608
Shading Units
8
288
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G98
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy