CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
+20636%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
VS
Quadro FX 580
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
32
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.00 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
G96C
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
G96-875-C1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Board Design
260W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA L40G
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K2
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy