Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +20636%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
32
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.00 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G96C
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
G96-875-C1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy