Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1648%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
640
288
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GM107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy