Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +480%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000
2.573 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
1664
288
TMUs
104
96
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.47 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.39 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.573 TFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
80.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
120W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GM204
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GM204-850-A1
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy