NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

VS

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1620MHz vs 1560MHz)

More VRAM (48GB vs 20GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 280.0GB/s)

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 7 months late

1536 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (70W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

14.93 TFLOPS

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +28%

19.17 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

VS

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Graphics Card

Aug 2018

Release Date

Mar 2023

Quadro

Generation

Quadro Ada

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz

Base Clock

720 MHz

1620 MHz

Boost Clock

1560 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

48GB

Memory Size

20GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

384bit

Memory Bus

160bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

280.0GB/s

Render Config

72

SM Count

48

-

Compute Units

-

4608

Shading Units

6144

288

TMUs

192

96

ROPs

80

576

Tensor Cores

192

72

RT Cores

48

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

6 MB

L2 Cache

48 MB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

124.8 GPixel/s

466.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

299.5 GTexel/s

29.86 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

19.17 TFLOPS

14.93 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

19.17 TFLOPS

466.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

299.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

AD104

TU102-875-A1

GPU Variant

-

Turing

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

5 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

35.8 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

294 mm²

Board Design

260W

TDP

70W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

No outputs

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

8.9

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

2

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

3

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q

4

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB

5

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

6

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

7

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

8

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile

9

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M40

10

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA L40G

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD