NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q

VS

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2070 Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 1 months late

Boost Clock1620MHz

More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)

4160 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q 's Advantages

Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1352%

14.93 TFLOPS

Tesla M2070 Q

1.028 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

VS

Tesla M2070 Q

Graphics Card

Aug 2018

Release Date

Jul 2011

Quadro

Generation

Tesla

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz

Base Clock

-

1620 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

783 MHz

Memory

48GB

Memory Size

6GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

384bit

Memory Bus

384bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

150.3GB/s

Render Config

-

72

SM Count

14

4608

Shading Units

448

288

TMUs

56

96

ROPs

48

576

Tensor Cores

-

72

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

6 MB

L2 Cache

768 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

16.07 GPixel/s

466.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

32.14 GTexel/s

29.86 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

14.93 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1028 GFLOPS

466.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W

TDP

225W

600 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

GF100

TU102-875-A1

GPU Variant

GF100-876-A1

Turing

Architecture

Fermi

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

40 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

3.1 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

7.5

CUDA

2.0

6.6

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q

2

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

3

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

4

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

5

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

6

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla D870

7

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q

8

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

9

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 8 GB

10

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K560Q

Related News

1

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

2

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

3

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

4

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

5

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

6

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

7

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

8

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

9

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

10

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage