NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs AMD Instinct MI300X

VS

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages

Lower TDP (260W vs 750W)

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 4 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2100MHz vs 1620MHz)

More VRAM (192GB vs 48GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)

14848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

14.93 TFLOPS

AMD Instinct MI300X +994%

163.4 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

VS

AMD Instinct MI300X

Graphics Card

Aug 2018

Release Date

Dec 2023

Quadro

Generation

Instinct

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz

Base Clock

1000 MHz

1620 MHz

Boost Clock

2100 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

5200 MHz

Memory

48GB

Memory Size

192GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

HBM3

384bit

Memory Bus

8192bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

5300GB/s

Render Config

72

SM Count

-

Compute Units

304

4608

Shading Units

19456

288

TMUs

880

96

ROPs

0

576

Tensor Cores

-

72

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

6 MB

L2 Cache

16 MB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

0 MPixel/s

466.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1496 GTexel/s

29.86 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

1300 TFLOPS

14.93 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

163.4 TFLOPS

466.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

MI300

TU102-875-A1

GPU Variant

-

Turing

Architecture

CDNA 3.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

5 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

146 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

1017 mm²

Board Design

260W

TDP

750W

600 W

Suggested PSU

1000 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

N/A

4.6

OpenGL

N/A

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

7.5

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

2

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

3

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q

4

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

5

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

6

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB

7

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

8

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

9

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

10

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

Related News

1

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

2

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

3

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

4

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

5

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

6

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

7

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

8

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

9

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

10

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products