NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+2637%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
6
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
GT216
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
