NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+292%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+492%
2934
Quadro K3000M
495
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
576
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
GK104
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
