NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1700MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
2.957 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+665%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
6656
56
TMUs
416
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
