CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile
+436%
2.607 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile
VS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
256
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
81.48 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
5.215 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.607 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
81.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
3
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
4
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon 780M
7
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
8
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
9
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy