CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
VS
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile
+464%
2.607 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile
VS
Quadro FX 3800
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
81.48 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
5.215 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.607 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
81.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
50W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
3
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
4
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon 780M
7
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
8
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
9
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy