Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1200 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (18W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T1200 Mobile
2.918 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +405%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

855 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

45.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
91.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
5.837 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
2.918 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy