Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2100MHz vs 1620MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
13568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +3594%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
14592
64
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
146 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy