Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1620MHz vs 1395MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +201%
9.999 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net