NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+14981%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370M
0.022 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
