NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1785MHz vs 1550MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+507%
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
448
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
100 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
