Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1785MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +154%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
68W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy