NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and a Mobile platform GPU: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1785MHz vs 1485MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+20%
3.656 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
3.041 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3220
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+14%
3676
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Mobile
1426
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+16%
1668
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Apr 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Professional
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1485 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.04 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.083 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.041 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G61
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
