Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1785MHz vs 1557MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +205%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
1329 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GP107
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy