Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +3592%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy