Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +124%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
1152
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy