Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1785MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +323%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy