Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +17309%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy