NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1785MHz vs 1620MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+10%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3220
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Mobile
1426
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+5%
1505
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
