NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+255%
3.656 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
