Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q +808%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro VX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
252.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy