Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon 3000 IGP vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

ATI Radeon 3000 IGP vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 3000 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 3000 IGP
0.028 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 +2528%
0.736 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2013
TeraScale IGP
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
1.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
28.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RS780
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
RS780L
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 7.5
-
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
22 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
Unknown
85 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.3
1.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy